Baby clothes or baby clothes are baby clothes. Baby fashion is a sociocultural consumer practice that encodes children's fashion representation of many social features and describes systems characterized by differences in social class, wealth, gender or ethnicity.
Video Infant clothing
Size
The size of baby clothes and toddlers is usually based on age. This is usually preemie for babies born prematurely, 0 to 3 months, 3 to 6 months, 6 to 9 months, 9 to 12 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months, even though there is no the definition of industry standards for that measure. Most retailers give size charts based on child weight, height, or both, and the child's weight and height percentile can also be used for the correct size of the clothes for the baby.
In an article in the October 2011 issue of Ladies' Home Journal, B. F. Skinner stated that clothes and sleepwear "interfere with normal exercise and growth and keep babies from taking comfortable posture or changing posture during sleep." Babies can stretch, needing clothes that are loose enough to allow movement.
Maps Infant clothing
Mode
In recent centuries, Baby Fashion has distinctive features among social classes. Dresses have a strong potential for displaying social differences. In general Baby Fashion is exploited by high classes, or so-called elites, to trade symbols of power, wealth, wealth. The children's appearance is useful to represent the family's position in the community. Meanwhile, on the other hand, the working class does not engage in this kind of practice, since clothing should be practical and inexpensive. It should be remembered that in feudal societies, as in industrial societies, children work as well as adults. The Baby Fashion's symbolic value between the high classes and the nobility is not just the peculiarity of the west. For example, in some African countries or oriental countries the colors and shapes take a special interest, while the Western elite concentrates on fabrics and precious materials. But perhaps Western European fashion puts more pressure on the representation of social positions through clothing; in fact, this practice became customary by the end of the thirteenth century. Paintings and family portraits are very common amongst the European high classes, so today we have many examples of the features of Baby Fashion. The special characteristic of the ancient Baby Fashion is the absence of marked gender differences between young people. After a certain age, the girls are painted in large dresses, and boys with trousers, or regular military uniforms. But before they reach the age of ten, usually, children are represented in dresses, whether they are male or female. The symbols of wealth and power are translated by these rich dresses, with large, ornate, ornate gowns and embroidered details. This style was developed in Spanish courts in the 14th century and became common in other Catholic countries such as Italy or France. This rich style is very difficult, almost for modern observers, to recognize the boys of women. Many examples come from European courts of the 17th and 18th centuries, where the paintings of families in which the expression of power is very important. In France, Elizabeth Vigà © à © e-Lebrun represents the young children of Mary Antoinette, and the younger queen's son wears a soft, white traditional dress.
In the United States, before the 1890s children mostly wore clothing made by their parents. In 1910, retailers have established a "publicity structure" of children for the sale of children's goods, resulting in a significant increase in the sale of children's clothing produced, sportswear, sweets, and baby clothing. By 1915, baby clothes had become one of the largest industries in the country.
In the 1980s, the design of baby clothing and toddler clothes became an increasing source of income for US designer labels and fashion design houses, such as Polo Ralph Lauren and Guess. Gap Inc. founded Baby Gap in 1990, four years after introducing Gap Kids .
The age of first mothers has increased in Western culture, from 21.5 years in 1970 to over 25 years in early 2000, and hence they have more disposable income to spend on baby items, including clothing.
Baby clothing is in the category of retail and wholesale trade of the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). For the 2012 revision, wholesale baby clothes fall into the category 424330 (Clothing and Apparel Accessories for Women, Children and Infants) and retail baby clothes are in the 448130 category (Baby and Infant Apparel Store).
Role model
Model mimics have changed over the years. In the past, nobility had what was regarded as an ideal style paradigm. While today, the upper-middle class embodies an ideal style; in particular, in today's pop culture, this role is covered by celebrities and so-called V.I.P.
gender convention
Clothing has long been used to conceal sexual differences in its powerful biological sense and, at the same time, to show and mark it through assumptions about gender in dress codes. The way in which a baby is dressed "affects behavior toward the baby". Clothing may be typed by color (eg - pink or yellow for girls, blue or red for boys), or with style (ruffles and swollen arms for girls). If children's clothing, in the past, was used to distinguish those from wealthy families from the poor, today's clothing is a symbol of gender differentiation.
A 1985 study found that US parents were not "distracted by foreigners who misinterpreted the sex of the baby".
Gender differentiation
Gender is the way in which social practice is ordered. In the process of gender differentiation, the behavior of everyday life is regulated in relation to biological differences, determined by the body structure and the process of human reproduction. Therefore, the body is the agent and object of practice. The body's reflexive practices that define social structure are not internal to the individual, but they involve social relations and shared symbolism. They may involve large-scale social institutions. In this structured practice of the body, special versions of femininity and masculinity are manifested as meaningful bodies and meaning embodied. Through body-reflexive practice and through the biological division of the human body into male and female, more than individual life is formed: the social world is formed, modeled on the basis of gender stereotypes.
Stereotype
Based on gender stereotypes, we interpret the representation, image or classification of men, women, or gender relations, presenting a simplified, conventional and selective picture of the lives of men and women. This representation is quite often spread by the exposure of TV content, which has been linked to more stereotypical sexual attitudes (ie, the view that men are sexually stereotyped, the idea that women think is a sexual object to be valued for their appearance). Therefore, stereotypes are often the vehicle for the norm of inequality. For example, devaluing women can persistently have the effect of celebrating masculine male power, or believing that women and men should be confined to a narrow and fragmented social role. In Baby Fashion, consumption that is differentiated by sex can change from toys to clothing accessories or certain objects of everyday life. This particular structured system becomes an important tool for maintaining a fully constructed gender social identity. Regardless of the differences in gender studies that have been conducted over the last years, it seems that sex role theory, which is an old approach based on adat and social adjustment forces, seems correct about some of the existing social constructions. Sex role theory explains gender patterns by attracting social habits that define appropriate behavior for women and men. People learn their roles, on the way grow, and then do them under social pressure. According to this theory, children, from the first years of their lives, are distinguished into girls and boys. They dress with colors that can be identified each other's gender, pink and blue colors are typical. Children dressed in blue should behave differently than those in pink clothing: they must be rough, aggressive, demanding and stronger. In contrast, children in pink dress should behave in a passive, obedient and even more beautiful way. As girls grow older they wear cute dresses, they are given toys like dolls and makeup accessories, and they are taught to always take care of their physical aspects, to be able to cook and to always educate and be gentle with others.. On the other hand, when boys grow up, they are taught how to drive cars, how to be competitive in the market to earn money and how to pursue all those who wear pink.
Consumerism
Speaking of baby fashion, it is important to emphasize the consumerism behind all this. Buying baby clothes becomes more and more a fashion phenomenon so that, since they are primarily purchased by parents, sometimes purchasing actions are brought to the top through the child's objective. In fact, it can happen that they are adopted as a means to demonstrate their family's ability to keep up with the latest fashions. When clothing is used in a way different from the norm, clothing can attract attention and provoke reactions. This assertion is supported by many of the practices that define the current society and that highlights the current phenomenon: child sexualization.
Sexualisation
Acceptable sexual connotations expressed by clothing depend on the age and age of the person wearing the clothes. However, clothing continually witnessed the phenomenon of sexization, resulting from backgrounds that affect both adults and children. Indeed, the body is more visible today than it was in the 1800s and in the first half of the 1900s. The clothes themselves are innocent, that is the way in which they are displayed that make them sexual: this happens mainly because of the influence of various media (television, internet, music, social networking, advertising etc.), and the way children's clothing is thrown away with adults. The automatic consequence is the relationship between two types of clothing, which are summarized in common practice, by producers and retailers, from adult versions derived to child mode. In this way, instead of age-appropriate clothing, children wear clothing that is in principle designed for adults. This happens especially with young girls who, at present, can be easily seen wearing short skirts, high heels, deep necks, bikinis or layered bra, are all available in fabrics and prints that most people would consider inadequate for them. In fact, fashion is seen as the application of oppressive forms of gender identity, embodying practices designed to realize and limit small girls. At the same time, it would be difficult to ignore the limitations given to boys as well. They are pressured by expectations about the proper masculine behavior of parents, school, mass media and peer groups. The role model of the masculine is given by the sportsman, the military hero, etc. And social sanctions, from mild to violent rejection, are applied to boys and men who are inconsistent with role norms. This phenomenon is exacerbated by the untimely sexual development of children who have registered in recent years. In fact, it has been shown that contemporary children tend to reach sexual maturity at an early age, thus accelerating mental, physical and emotional evolution and capturing the possibility of wearing a bold dress.
Dangers
Excessive thermal insulation has been associated with an increased incidence of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). The main cause is excess bed or clothing, soft sleeping surface, and stuffed animals. Odds ratio of SIDS associated with thermal insulation of at least two togs above the lower critical values ​​(after adjusting for season and confounding factors) was 1.35 in the New Zealand study, which also found that SIDS has some correlation with too little thermal insulation. A 1984 study of 34 infant cot deaths found that for 2/3 excessive clothing and over-wrapping are the contributing causes.
Clothes are responsible for the increased incidence of congenital hip dislocation (CDH) in Japanese infants. Traditionally, diapers and clothing have been applied to infants "with legs in extension". Prior to 1965, the incidence of CDH in infants reached 3.5%, but the national campaign established in 1975 "to avoid extending hip and knee extension during early postnatal periods" led to a decrease in the incidence of CDH in infants. up to 0.2% in the early 1980s.
Fire hazard
Suitable sleeping outfits are "always safer than loose long sleepwear".
Canada prohibits the import, sale, or advertising of clothing classes and other consumer products that do not meet the minimum standards of flammability. Standards for infant and children's sleepwear were defined in 1971 and amended in 1987 as part of the Dangerous Products Act. Each textile product must also fulfill the textile labeling requirements specified in the Textile Labeling Law regulated by the Canadian Industrial Competition Bureau.
In the United States, flammable textiles are subject to the US Flammable Fabrics Act. One study found that children younger than five years had a higher incidence of sleepwear fires than any other age group, and that they had "an unreasonable risk of death or injury from a fire accident involving sleepwear". This causes the first flammable standard for baby and children's sleepwear. On April 30, 1996, the Consumer Product Safety Commission relaxed the standards for flammability in children's sleepwear, allowing retailers to sell "tight-fitting children's sleepwear and sleepwear for babies aged 9 months or younger" who did not meet the easy criteria burning.
Hygiene and health
Source of the article : Wikipedia
0 Comments